2011-04-25 New York Times, NPR Collude With US Government On Gitmo Files Coverage
Monday, April 25, 2011 at 10:25AM 
By Kevin Gozstola
A statement from the Pentagon was published just after 9 pm ET on April 24th, no more than an hour or two after the New York Times had posted their package covering the Gitmo Files they had not obtained from WikiLeaks. The statement was posted on NPR and the Times website. Yet, again, it seems this is an instance of complete collusion between the press and government.
(Image via Paul Keller, Creative Commons)
Michael Calderone reports "representatives from NPR and the Times visited the White House and spoke with Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell and members of Joint Task Force Guantanamo." And, "The news organizations agreed to some redactions requested by government officials but not all of them."
Recall, in February, it was found out that the Times had met with the State Department prior to their release of the US State Embassy Cables. Marcy Wheeler over at Firedoglake highlighted NYT’s close cooperation with the State Department:
Because of the range of the material and the very nature of diplomacy, the embassy cables were bound to be more explosive than the War Logs. Dean Baquet, our Washington bureau chief, gave the White House an early warning on Nov. 19. The following Tuesday, two days before Thanksgiving, Baquet and two colleagues were invited to a windowless room at the State Department, where they encountered an unsmiling crowd. Representatives from the White House, the State Department, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the C.I.A., the Defense Intelligence Agency, the F.B.I. and the Pentagon gathered around a conference table. Others, who never identified themselves, lined the walls. A solitary note-taker tapped away on a computer.
The meeting was off the record, but it is fair to say the mood was tense. Scott Shane, one reporter who participated in the meeting, described “an undertone of suppressed outrage and frustration.”
Subsequent meetings, which soon gave way to daily conference calls, were more businesslike. Before each discussion, our Washington bureau sent over a batch of specific cables that we intended to use in the coming days. They were circulated to regional specialists, who funneled their reactions to a small group at State, who came to our daily conversations with a list of priorities and arguments to back them up. We relayed the government’s concerns, and our own decisions regarding them, to the other news outlets.
Once again, the Timesopted to subvert its duty and be for the State instead of fully owning its role as a member of the Fourth Estate. It chose to cover for power instead of covering power. [Unfortunately, on matters of national security and war, this is what typically happens.]
Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell’s statement is a well-prepared statement. It does not simply condemn the release of the files and then make a general note about the US and how it is committed to upholding human rights and so on and so forth. The statement clearly outlines that a Guantanamo Task Force was established in January 2009 and suggests that the material published may be outdated because the Task Force has made assessments of detainees and those reports were not released.
The statement also claims, “Both the previous and the current Administrations have made every effort to act with the utmost care and diligence in transferring detainees from Guantanamo.” That may be mostly true, as the US State Embassy cables released by WikiLeaks indicated Guantanamo detainees had been used as “bargaining chips.” American diplomats bargained with countries to help empty the prison by resettling detainees. They told Slovenia if it wanted to get a meeting with President Barack Obama. They offered Kiribati incentives “worth millions of dollars to take Chinese Muslim detainees.” Diplomats suggested to Belgium that by taking detainees it could be a “low-cost way for Belgium to attain prominence in Europe.”
If the process of resettling has not worked as planned, perhaps the manner in which the US went about trying to resettle detainees is partly to blame for the inconvenience these terror suspects have caused the supreme power. Or, perhaps, the fact that, as Amy Davidson of the New Yorker writes, the US reasoning for detaining individuals does "not always really involve a belief that a prisoner is dangerous to us or has committed some crime; sometimes (and this is more debased) we mostly think we might find him useful"—Perhaps, that has something to do with the complications being experienced.
The Pentagon statement notes the “previous Administration transferred 537 detainees; to date, the current Administration has transferred 67” Former President George W. Bush occupied the position of US President of the United States for eight years. That means on average Bush released 67 detainees each year of his presidency. But, actually, that’s a poor calculation because the first detainee wasn’t released from Guantanamo until 2002. So, in reality, Bush released an average of 89 detainees each year he was president.
How many detainees has Obama released each year thus far? About 34 detainees each year. And, unlike Bush, President Obama was actually committed to closing Guantanamo.
The statement continues, “Both Administrations have made the protection of American citizens the top priority and we are concerned that the disclosure of these documents could be damaging to those efforts.”
The “security” of American citizens is of so much concern that detainees are a different class of people in the United States. They are de-human and not allowed civilian trials in the United States. They are “enemy combatants” and not prisoners of war and thus are not able to claim protections under the Geneva Conventions.
Finally, the statement concludes, “We will continue to work with allies and partners around the world to mitigate threats to the U.S. and other countries and to work toward the ultimate closure of the Guantanamo detention facility, consistent with good security practices and our values as a nation.”
But, just how hard does the Pentagon and the Obama Administration plan to work to close Guantanamo? In 2009, the Senate canceled $80 million to fund the relocation of Guantanamo detainees. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye and Republican Sen. James Inhofe slid a provision into a war appropriations bill that made it so “none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this act may be used to transfer, release, or incarcerate any individual who was detained as of May 19, 2009, at Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to or within the United States."
In March of this year, President Obama announced he would restart military commissions for Guantanamo detainees and no longer push to secure civilian trials for the detainees in the United States. He also announced “a new process for continuing to hold those detainees not charged or convicted but deemed too dangerous to be free.”
Despite the fact that he had pledged to close Guantanamo by January 2010 days after his inauguration, he defended military commissions saying they “ensure our security and our values are strengthened.” But, these announcements virtually ensured that Guantanamo would continue to stay open.
Where are these detainees going to go when not being tried? And, if they are not being given civilian trials, what makes anyone think they will be resettled in civilian prisons? They would have to be held at military prisons. And, what is the likelihood that they would be resettled in prisons on the US mainland if there is no political will to support trying detainees in cities like New York?
The Obama Administration currently has no public campaign to close the Guantanamo prison beyond the words that are printed in this statement. It is not advocating vigorously for the closure. It is much harder for it to defend the prison’s closure than it is to defend it staying fully operational.
The Pentagon is not suggesting the release of this information will endanger lives. The Times and other news organizations are already spinning the reports as information that shows what alleged terrorists were up to on September 11 and after before they were seized or captured. Thus, the release of the information could, if spun correctly by media, help the government defend continuing the "war on terror." It could obscure revelations on the flawed process of assessing whether a detainee is dangerous or not, whether a detainee has information that can be used to capture leaders of al Qaeda, whether a detainee deserved to be transferred to Guantanamo, etc.
The disclosure of information will hurt the government not because this information was "obtained illegally" but because, like many releases from WikiLeaks, it shows us the truth of what has been going on with detainees right down to specific details about each detainee in the prison.
Contrary to Morrell’s suggestion, the released documents are more likely to help spur efforts to close Guantanamo than damage the efforts. The release will force Americans to once again ask themselves why the military prison in Cuba needs to remain open. It will give human rights organizations another opportunity to force the political class in Washington to confront the prison, one the Bush Administration crafted legal justification to help prevent officials from being prosecuted for illegal or inhumane conduct.
It may not have the impact of getting the prison closed, but the transparency or disclosure is still valuable to the world. If this doesn’t catalyze a second burst of will from America to close the prison, one thing is certain: It will reveal yet another inhuman and callous American reality.
Reader Comments (4)
Thanks for the summary...I think this will help close Guantanamo.
We're able to in no way not allow who old style replica designer watches are really acceptable for funding. Typically the iwc fliegeruhrwhich are usually stated to be from funding benefits a large number of not at all times make a profit whereas some of those to some degree referred to iwc ingenieur watch will often supply astound. The beauty from a iwc pilot replica ıs determined by her attraction not to mention deficiency.
In case you have any louis vuitton speedy 25 in a crease it really is fake. If you discover any "LV" crooked or within the stitch it is fake. Louis Vuitton has a passion for perfection for each of their handcrafted purse or handbag given that the 1850s. They cautiously design where the LV should be place on the bag and also the LVs are always positioned on the louis vuitton speedy 35 with balance.In case you have any LV monogram in a crease it's fake. In case you discover any "LV" crooked or inside the stitch it's fake. louis vuitton speedy sale has a passion for perfection for every of their handcrafted purse or louis vuitton speedy 40 since the 1850s. They very carefully style exactly where the LV must be place on the bag and also the LVs are often positioned on the bag with balance.But in general louis vuitton, men and women will not connect diaper bags with fashion, due to the fact diaper bags primarily concentrate on the practicability, perhaps some of them are really practical louis vuitton sale but without the sense of beauty. As the modern day individuals, we really should change in addition to the time change, if the designers could combine the practical points with aesthetic points louis vuitton speedy mini that could be excellent. Louis Vuitton monogrammed diaper bags are so wealthy louis vuitton speedy function and ornamentation that these handbags had turn into the women's louis vuitton saleindispensable attachment.But lots of people like myself want to go treasure hunting and appear for handbags at a far more reasonable cost. Areas like Auction, eBay as well as other on-line stores have a lot of listing of handbags and purses of all of the designer brand names you can assume of and out with the several every day listings, a portion of them are fake replicas louis vuitton speedy 45. Some of the listings are actually great offers that folks just can't miss. Anyway please read via the lists below to learn some things about this one and only 1, distinctive designer brand handbag so that it is possible to spot a treasure and scope out the fakes, make a fun shopping knowledge louis vuitton speedy 30.But lots of people like coach purse outletmyself need to go treasure hunting and look for handbags at a more reasonable price tag. Locations like Auction, eBay and other on the internet stores have a lot of listing of handbags and purses of all the designer louis vuitton speedy damier brand names it is possible to assume of and out with the a lot of day-to-day listings, a portion of them are fake replicas. Some of the listings are really good offers that men and women louis vuitton speedy monogram just cannot miss. Anyway please read by means of the lists below to learn a few points about this 1 and only 1, special designer brand handbag so that you can spot a treasure and scope out the fakes, make a entertaining shopping experience.
very wink of people. if it is out of this thing, true religion jeans Zhao and his wife of Zhao Wenhu teacher perceptions are very good.Jail really want Zhaowen Hu, Zhao Teachers do not know how to face the home of those relatives and friends, everyone will blame him for an official, disowned the. Zhao normal eyes, the eyes naturally fall Liu Jun, the present position no hurry, just meditation. But not everyone speak.Meditation for a while, Liu Chun asked: "Xiao country, in addition to farming communities included in the audit scope, brand at the meeting also discussed what a good way?"